Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 16, 2017 16:47:32 GMT 7
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 31, 2017 14:10:44 GMT 7
By' length of time on the DSP' does that mean if you have been on it a long time you are less likely to be chosen or more likley to be chosen? also ' a pattern of overseas travel' the only times l have been overseas are once on 2012 and once again in 2013, is that enough to make me a target. also ' the person has not previously attended a job capacity assessment' l thought everyone has done a job capacity assessment to get the DSP in the first place
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 31, 2017 14:27:58 GMT 7
By' length of time on the DSP' does that mean if you have been on it a long time you are less likely to be chosen or more likley to be chosen? also ' a pattern of overseas travel' the only times l have been overseas are once on 2012 and once again in 2013, is that enough to make me a target. also ' the person has not previously attended a job capacity assessment' l thought everyone has done a job capacity assessment to get the DSP in the first place Not everyone on DSP has to have done a JCA. People with manifest don't have to do one. If you're on UP I doubt the overseas would trigger a review.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 31, 2017 14:31:48 GMT 7
"if the person has regularly reported any income;"
So if the dsp'er tried doing some part-time or casual work they will be punished with a review.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 31, 2017 14:46:34 GMT 7
By' length of time on the DSP' does that mean if you have been on it a long time you are less likely to be chosen or more likley to be chosen? also ' a pattern of overseas travel' the only times l have been overseas are once on 2012 and once again in 2013, is that enough to make me a target. also ' the person has not previously attended a job capacity assessment' l thought everyone has done a job capacity assessment to get the DSP in the first placeI believe that is referring to people that didn't have one since grant and since the 2012 tables took place.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 31, 2017 15:08:56 GMT 7
By' length of time on the DSP' does that mean if you have been on it a long time you are less likely to be chosen or more likley to be chosen? also ' a pattern of overseas travel' the only times l have been overseas are once on 2012 and once again in 2013, is that enough to make me a target. also ' the person has not previously attended a job capacity assessment' l thought everyone has done a job capacity assessment to get the DSP in the first place Not everyone on DSP has to have done a JCA. People with manifest don't have to do one. If you're on UP I doubt the overseas would trigger a review. l don't have UP l hope my two trips don't make me a target
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 31, 2017 15:41:29 GMT 7
wombat79......the only criteria that I don't fit is "Reporting Income." If the ANAO is to be believed, it is extensive overseas travel rather than the 28 days once a year that may trigger a review. Because a single pensioner can have around $200,000 in cash assets and still receive full pension, this then provides the option to have four weeks paid, thirteen unpaid, then thirteen weeks unpaid multiple times again. I believe people in this position are much much more likely to trigger a review than you or me. I have not been reviewed for almost fifteen years and have been overseas every year for the last ten, using whatever rules were current at the time, including flying in, reporting, then flying out later the same day or early the next, in addition I have had an overseas holiday of 28 days every year since 2015, so that obviously isn't a sufficient pattern of travel to trigger a review.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 31, 2017 15:47:36 GMT 7
Not everyone on DSP has to have done a JCA. People with manifest don't have to do one. If you're on UP I doubt the overseas would trigger a review. l don't have UP l hope my two trips don't make me a target I doubt that will but I won't lie, some of the other criteria may possibly. That is not to say you will but merely to be prepared for the possibility. Beauty of this forum is people give ideas and help that help us all in dire times waiting for stuff like this.
|
|
|
Post by nomadic on May 31, 2017 16:28:46 GMT 7
I'm sorry guys but this topic should be forgotten. Sitting around sweating if you are up for review is totally pointless. You are only putting yourselves under needless stress. It's something nobody can predict. If it happens then worry about it. If it doesn't then the worrying is achieving nothing. 90,000 sounds and is a lot but still a 9 out of 10 chance that you wont be reviewed. And it may take years anyhow. I wish i could back horses with those odds. There are lots of people who are genuinely stressed today with good reasons. The 4 week portability seems to have been forgotten but it is making people miserable as we type right now, just as one example.
|
|
|
Post by Denis-NFA on Jun 1, 2017 19:19:13 GMT 7
I'm sorry guys but this topic should be forgotten. Sitting around sweating if you are up for review is totally pointless. You are only putting yourselves under needless stress. It's something nobody can predict. If it happens then worry about it. If it doesn't then the worrying is achieving nothing. 90,000 sounds and is a lot but still a 9 out of 10 chance that you wont be reviewed. And it may take years anyhow. I wish i could back horses with those odds. There are lots of people who are genuinely stressed today with good reasons. The 4 week portability seems to have been forgotten but it is making people miserable as we type right now, just as one example. Totally agree nomadicBut I was granted UP in July 2013 with a proviso that I couldn't improve for 5 years, which takes me to July 2018. Under the new OAP stuff I am not eligible for OAP until First January, 2019. What is to stop satanlink from calling me in for a review. Highly unlikely but it still sits in the back of my mind.
|
|
|
Post by nomadic on Jun 2, 2017 7:03:20 GMT 7
denis, if they review you or bear or banjo i will go on strike. Sounds as though you are my twin. U.P. same year as me and OAP approaching faster than i/we want. They may even review banjo for not looking old enough to get the OAP. That's one thing I will never have to worry about as even in my 50's i was given the discount at the movies for seniors without showing a card as the girl would just assume I had a seniors card even in those days. Yes i growled at her but still took the discount.
|
|
|
Post by Denis-NFA on Jun 3, 2017 14:33:31 GMT 7
denis, if they review you or bear or banjo i will go on strike. Sounds as though you are my twin. U.P. same year as me and OAP approaching faster than i/we want. They may even review banjo for not looking old enough to get the OAP. That's one thing I will never have to worry about as even in my 50's i was given the discount at the movies for seniors without showing a card as the girl would just assume I had a seniors card even in those days. Yes i growled at her but still took the discount. hey nomadicproud to be your "twin".
|
|
|
Post by nomadic on Jun 3, 2017 14:45:11 GMT 7
Thanks denis, i just hope for your sake we are not identical.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 3, 2017 14:52:47 GMT 7
Neither of you have seen me! It's been happening for a while now but when shaving I swear it's my dad looking back at me. Believe me, that is scary.
|
|
|
Post by mikey on Jun 4, 2017 9:12:15 GMT 7
The following is listed on inHuman Services website, regards who won't be asked for a Medical Risk Based Reviews. (I assume these criteria are exemptions from the algorithm, but we are aware how that has been a failure for manifest cases) Who we review
We may do a medical risk based review if you started to get DSP more than 2 years ago and haven’t had a medical review in the past 2 years. Who we won’t review
You won’t have a medical risk based review if you’re: - 60 years old or over
- eligible for DSP under current manifest rules - working in Australian Disability Enterprises or in the Supported Wage System, - or paid under an International Agreement and live permanently overseas www.humanservices.gov.au/customer/enablers/medical-risk-based-reviews-disability-support-pension
|
|