Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 12, 2013 7:43:06 GMT 7
@frugle jellyThere is no legal requirement under the Social Security Act nor its regulations nor under the Social Security Administration Act for anyone to attend 1, 2, 5 10 or, death bed interviews. Jelly, you may be under some 5 year review internal Centrelink review process.... but its normal... they have to do reviews. And Frugle..... the fact is... no matter which way people twist it... you are either elligble to be classified as disabled or not... that's it. There is no problem being classified under the 'new' rules unless someone is pulling a scam... that's all... lt just seems unfair to me one year they say you are eligible for the pension then they can change the rules and take it away from you even if you medical condition is the same. If your medical condition improves then its fair enough they take it away. But l think l probably will pass under the new rules but l just don't want to go through the stress of it all again knowing theres a risk l can lose it.
|
|
|
Post by Banjo on Aug 12, 2013 7:47:46 GMT 7
I personally believe that the key part of the legislation was "no future work capacity" which clearly should be based on other issues besides points in an assessment table. Any SSAT appeal I support will make full use of this.
|
|
|
Post by wbmania72 on Aug 12, 2013 12:57:46 GMT 7
i dont understand that how can someone being at risk of losing their DSP after only 10 mins or so assessment by C/L despite of that person's doctor writes a reasonably good report. how far and low can these spineless @#$%^&* go to disregard doctors report? that sound like illegal and very insulting and disrespecting for the doctor. can they say that we know you better than your own doctor?he knows nothing and we dont believe his report,but we know the best? or just to prove our point we can assess you only and only in 10 or 20 mins rather than for years as it took years for your doctor to do so.
|
|
|
Post by Denis-NFA on Aug 14, 2013 15:36:11 GMT 7
@frugle said "I just don't want to go through the stress of it all again knowing there is a risk I can lose it."
Mate.... I fully agree.
As far as I am concerned it is bloody stressful.
|
|
|
Post by mick on Aug 14, 2013 20:35:17 GMT 7
Just be persistent with them, I have had Six assessments with CL in the last two years. If you do get knocked back dont go straight for the appeal, instead submit some more evidence and ask for another assessment. There is no limit on the amount of new evidence you can submit or assessments. CL once told me an assessment costs the taxpayer around Five thousand dollars each! In the end the right boxes will be ticked, provided your legit.
|
|
|
Post by Denis-NFA on Aug 14, 2013 21:46:27 GMT 7
Just be persistent with them, I have had Six assessments with CL in the last two years. If you do get knocked back dont go straight for the appeal, instead submit some more evidence and ask for another assessment. There is no limit on the amount of new evidence you can submit or assessments. CL once told me an assessment costs the taxpayer around Five thousand dollars each! In the end the right boxes will be ticked, provided your legit.
|
|