|
|
Post by genx on Mar 15, 2021 21:18:59 GMT 7
|
|
|
|
Post by bear on Mar 16, 2021 8:02:32 GMT 7
Great find genx This stuff goes way above my pay grade however, after a brief look I see they appear to view FDTS as totally irrelevant if an applicant hasn't done a POS. The fact is, doing one is likely to exacerbate the condition in quite a number of cases. This would seem to be devised to override medical advice from treating doctors. Though as I've said, well over my head. Cheers bear |
|
|
|
Post by tasjo on Mar 16, 2021 10:39:52 GMT 7
The other thing is that to be exempt of the POS requirement on health grounds you have to exit before applying for DSP.
Most people dont know until they have already completed their application and are then stuck.
|
|
|
|
Post by nomadic on Mar 16, 2021 21:48:05 GMT 7
Great find genx This stuff goes way above my pay grade however, after a brief look I see they appear to view FDTS as totally irrelevant if an applicant hasn't done a POS. The fact is, doing one is likely to exacerbate the condition in quite a number of cases. This would seem to be devised to override medical advice from treating doctors. Though as I've said, well over my head. Cheers bear If this is over bears head then it is space stuff for me after a brief look. Just shows how conniving they are to get their evil ways. How much time and money was spent on putting it altogether. GROWL indeed. Bureaucracy at its finest. |
|
|
|
Post by tasjo on Mar 17, 2021 6:05:39 GMT 7
As someone that used to work with processes its not all that comolex, but, the big thing they have forgotten is that they aremt comparing like for like...
Ie when your specialist talks about stability of your condition they are rarely talking about stability of functionality. That simply isnt their role. They often only see you once every 3-6 months and often dont relate to Centrelink definitions. Which is where an advocate or welfare rights can be invaluable before you apply and getring as much understanding of the process right to the end.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 17, 2021 11:01:31 GMT 7
As someone that used to work with processes its not all that comolex, but, the big thing they have forgotten is that they aremt comparing like for like... Ie when your specialist talks about stability of your condition they are rarely talking about stability of functionality. That simply isnt their role. They often only see you once every 3-6 months and often dont relate to Centrelink definitions. Which is where an advocate or welfare rights can be invaluable before you apply and getring as much understanding of the process right to the end. I got my treating specialist to address the question below I wanted him to comment on my functional improvement or lack of. Are further treatments reasonably available that are likely to lead to a significant functional improvement in my conditions enabling me to work in the next 5 years? |
|
|
|
Post by g777 on Mar 5, 2022 11:23:26 GMT 7
This link no good. Anyone come across new working link? haven't been able to find. |
|
|
|
Post by Banjo on Mar 5, 2022 14:10:35 GMT 7
That is interesting, the links are dead and copying and pasting them as text only returns you to our website. They're just under a year old so I cannot see why Centrelink would delete them if the information is still current. When bear gets back from loafing on his holidays I'll get him right on it.  |
|
|
|
Post by bear on Mar 5, 2022 15:33:36 GMT 7
The highlighted word above could to be key, reflecting on the sunset clause on current legislation that will see it all expire next month. I live in hope genx knows where they can be found and can reactivate them; as I can't seem to find anything about any of it...... Cheers bear |
|
|
|
Post by genx on Mar 5, 2022 23:05:06 GMT 7
The highlighted word above look to be key reflecting on the sunset clause on current legislation that will see it all expire next month. I live in hope genx knows where they can be found and can reactivate them; as I can't seem to find anything about any of it...... Cheers bear I believe the information is still there but Centrelink has blocked the public from viewing it's operations site. If you can see the operations site then you understand how Centrelink works from the inside, and apparently Centrelink does not want that. |
|
|
|
Post by Banjo on Mar 6, 2022 7:11:42 GMT 7
|
|
|
|
Post by bear on Mar 6, 2022 7:15:00 GMT 7
The highlighted word above look to be key reflecting on the sunset clause on current legislation that will see it all expire next month. I live in hope genx knows where they can be found and can reactivate them; as I can't seem to find anything about any of it...... Cheers bear I believe the information is still there but Centrelink has blocked the public from viewing it's operations site. If you can see the operations site then you understand how Centrelink works from the inside, and apparently Centrelink does not want that. Sounds most reasonable and plausible genx. I was surprised you'd actually gotten in in the first place TBH. Cheers bear |
|
|
|
Post by bear on Mar 6, 2022 7:21:28 GMT 7
WOW........Any structure as top heavy as that would be deemed engineering wise; totally unsafe and bound to fail, given enough elapsed time. Cheers bear |
|
|
|
Post by g777 on Mar 8, 2022 7:24:07 GMT 7
That is interesting, the links are dead and copying and pasting them as text only returns you to our website. They're just under a year old so I cannot see why Centrelink would delete them if the information is still current. When bear gets back from loafing on his holidays I'll get him right on it. I did try hard to find a new link or where these docs could have been moved to. No luck at all. They are not available for us anymore which is poor form. |
|
|
|
Post by g777 on Mar 8, 2022 7:27:44 GMT 7
did anyone save these docs/ pages when they were available? Hopefully another info hoarder pulled them down for prosperity - fingers crossed.
|
|
