|
Post by roxane on Jul 4, 2014 8:54:31 GMT 7
Sorry to keep boring you with this, I'm still not quite getting it, how on earth they managed to scrap an international agreement. The guy from CI sent me some info by mail, will probably get it next week, so will wait and see if there will be any reasonable explanation to it. What they say that the changes for working life residency came into effect on 01 July, somehow changed the int. agreement as well. Well I dragged myself through that long agreement, you can find it here www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/C2013C00024/Html/Volume_1#_Toc345491704and I still cannot find anything which would scrap the eligibility. There is absolutely nothing about having LESS!!!! than 10 years working life residency. - that's supposed to be the twisted explanation for it ... Unless they will update their website in the next couple of days.... Wondering if CL or CI just made it up, hoping people wouldn't have a close look into it? Apparently there's a clause to that document. Curious to know what it is exactly! Sorry dragging this on, but I just think that if they get around something like an Int Agreement, they can get around pretty much anything. They just need to make a clause, and modify however they want to. And for that, probably they don't even need a Senate.
|
|
|
Post by zingzingzing on Jul 4, 2014 9:06:48 GMT 7
No it's good to vent it out, and pursue it.
|
|
|
Post by Banjo on Jul 4, 2014 9:25:42 GMT 7
It always puzzles me how the Australians scrapped the international agreement with the UK but their citizens can still get their pension living in Australia.
|
|