Post by Banjo on Nov 16, 2016 16:12:49 GMT 7
Complex multiple impairments, sounds like it was too hard for the Govt. Doctor.
REASONS FOR DECISION
Mr S. Webb, Member
4 November 2016
Danny O’Cass claimed disability support pension (DSP). A delegate of the Secretary decided to reject his claim. Mr O’Cass has pressed his rights of review in respect of this decision, thus far without success. He has applied for further review by the Tribunal.
Conclusion
Mr O’Cass has impairments that attract a rating of more than 20 points under the Impairment Tables and he has a continuing inability to work. It follows that Mr O’Cass satisfies the essential requirements to qualify for DSP as of the date of his claim or during the qualification period.
Decision
The decision under review is set aside and in place thereof the Tribunal decides that Mr O’Cass qualified for DSP on the date of his claim.
www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/AATA/2016/876.html
REASONS FOR DECISION
Mr S. Webb, Member
4 November 2016
Danny O’Cass claimed disability support pension (DSP). A delegate of the Secretary decided to reject his claim. Mr O’Cass has pressed his rights of review in respect of this decision, thus far without success. He has applied for further review by the Tribunal.
Conclusion
Mr O’Cass has impairments that attract a rating of more than 20 points under the Impairment Tables and he has a continuing inability to work. It follows that Mr O’Cass satisfies the essential requirements to qualify for DSP as of the date of his claim or during the qualification period.
Decision
The decision under review is set aside and in place thereof the Tribunal decides that Mr O’Cass qualified for DSP on the date of his claim.
www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/AATA/2016/876.html
