|
|
Post by billy4u on Feb 25, 2013 3:49:45 GMT 7
|
|
|
|
Post by zorro1 on Feb 25, 2013 4:25:55 GMT 7
after the first few paragraphs I knew she wouldnt get it. Grand mall seizures that are mostly under control would not stop her from working.
|
|
|
|
Post by Banjo on Feb 25, 2013 7:43:34 GMT 7
There are no AAT appeals over the UP yet it's too soon.
I'm one of the few I know of who has been unsuccessful and I went to the ARO who upheld the decision after I waited nearly 6 months for him to get around to it.
I can still go to the SSAT but there's no way I'll get a decision before I turn 65 anyway and to be honest I'm starting to feel a bit worn down by it all.
I think it's more important that younger people with years of the DSP ahead of them get favourable appeal results, my success in the past over residency doesn't seem to have affected Centrelinks future decisions anyway.
|
|
|
|
Post by Banjo on Feb 25, 2013 7:47:30 GMT 7
|
|
|
|
Post by billy4u on Feb 27, 2013 10:57:04 GMT 7
|
|
|
|
Post by billy4u on Mar 2, 2013 0:18:32 GMT 7
|
|
|
|
Post by zorro1 on Mar 2, 2013 6:41:29 GMT 7
Mr Pavlis’ own evidence was that he can perform overhead activities such as getting things out of the cupboard, he can turn his head to look behind him, he can bend forward to pick something off a table and he can remain seated for 30 minutes depending on his seating arrangements. Mr Pavlis testified also that he can drive for about 30 minutes and had driven in to the hearing, taking about 45 minutes for the trip.
It is clear that Mr Pavlis does not meet the criteria for 20 impairment points. His evidence is, however, consistent with the criteria for 10 impairment points. Accordingly, I accept the assessment contained in the JCA report and find that Mr Pavlis’ lower back condition attracts an impairment rating of 10 points in accordance with Table 4 of the Impairment Tables.
Depression"
he bought himself undone here. Make note that HIS DRIVING TO to the hearing was used against him
|
|
|
|
Post by Banjo on Mar 2, 2013 7:17:16 GMT 7
He has rented and lived in a home with his wife in Indonesia for a number of years.Game set and match... he is an Indonesian resident.
|
|
|
|
Post by Banjo on Mar 2, 2013 7:21:56 GMT 7
Mr Pavlis’ own evidence was that he can perform overhead activities such as getting things out of the cupboard, he can turn his head to look behind him, he can bend forward to pick something off a table and he can remain seated for 30 minutes depending on his seating arrangements. Mr Pavlis testified also that he can drive for about 30 minutes and had driven in to the hearing, taking about 45 minutes for the trip. It is clear that Mr Pavlis does not meet the criteria for 20 impairment points. His evidence is, however, consistent with the criteria for 10 impairment points. Accordingly, I accept the assessment contained in the JCA report and find that Mr Pavlis’ lower back condition attracts an impairment rating of 10 points in accordance with Table 4 of the Impairment Tables. Depression" he bought himself undone here. Make note that HIS DRIVING TO to the hearing was used against him Centrelink assesses people on their best days. They have to be shown that the bad days are what matter. |
|
|
|
Post by takeo19 on Mar 2, 2013 7:22:36 GMT 7
Thats shocking, the poor guy maybe he should have got the depression diagnosed and not drove to the hearing, if he made more of a point that he couldnt wipe his own ass, how the hell can he hold a job..crazy.
|
|
|
|
Post by billy4u on Mar 3, 2013 3:22:46 GMT 7
Well he wont find a job....
|
|
|
|
Post by Banjo on Mar 3, 2013 9:56:06 GMT 7
This is the whole bullshit part of it, the legislation says "no future job capacity".... I was 64 at the time and they never took that into account.
phee bar mak mak....
Thais have many words for levels of craziness, that's the worst.
|
|
