|
Post by mick on Oct 5, 2013 11:29:17 GMT 7
They don't have any problem in considering people non-residents for spending too much time out of Australia. I'm not sure what you mean by the last line, it would be more like them setting a time limit to become a non-resident if they consider it part of the indefinite portability. Well they haven't set a time limit yet, so who cares? If it's not broke then dont fix it! Nothing in the act states that a condition of having UP is that you must become a non-resident, or will eventually become one.
|
|
|
Post by Banjo on Oct 5, 2013 11:33:27 GMT 7
May means if you pass the assessment.
|
|
|
Post by mick on Oct 5, 2013 11:36:34 GMT 7
What assessment?
|
|
|
Post by Banjo on Oct 5, 2013 11:42:48 GMT 7
They don't have any problem in considering people non-residents for spending too much time out of Australia. I'm not sure what you mean by the last line, it would be more like them setting a time limit to become a non-resident if they consider it part of the indefinite portability. Well they haven't set a time limit yet, so who cares? If it's not broke then dont fix it! Nothing in the act states that a condition of having UP is that you must become a non-resident, or will eventually become one. Sorry, we jumped a page, that was answering another query. Long term study of the guides and the Act reveals that loopholes are constantly left. I can only assume that these are deliberate so chosen people can slip under the bar for what ever nefarious reasons.
|
|
|
Post by mick on Oct 5, 2013 12:13:13 GMT 7
is there a different between unlimited and indefinite portability or are they the same? do we apply for one term or do we have to choose? Maca they are both the same but used interchangeably, some say UP and others say IP, it's the same thing.
|
|
|
Post by maca84 on Oct 5, 2013 18:06:11 GMT 7
thankx mick
|
|